| Name | Interconnection |
| Type | Syndication company |
| Threats | New media platforms • Media conglomerates • Government intrusion |
| Ownership | Independent |
| Service type | National programming |
| Major markets | Beijing • Tehran • São Paulo |
| Place of origin | Alternate timeline |
| Region or state | N/A |
Television networks in this alternate timeline differ significantly from the familiar broadcast networks of our reality like the Big Three or Big Four.
The development of television in this world began in the early 20th century alongside advances in radio broadcasting. However, due to differences in technological development and political structures, the evolution of television networks followed a distinctly different path.
In contrast to our timeline, there are no major broadcasting networks or alliances. Instead, almost every television station is independently owned by regional operators, local groups, or broadcasting corporations. This results in a decentralized system with a wide variety of programming choices, but also creates challenges in coordination and distribution of nationwide content.
To overcome these challenges, Interconnection, a powerful syndication company, emerged to serve as a middleman connecting television stations and distributing programming across the nation - much like its namesake in the early history of television in our timeline. This arrangement allows regional broadcasters to secure syndicated shows from national producers, ensuring a constant flow of fresh content.
The presence of Communist China, theocratic Iran, and oligarchic Brazil as major players in the television industry has a significant impact on the content and perspectives presented. In Beijing and Tehran, television is used as a tool to spread propaganda and reinforce the ideals of the ruling powers, while in São Paulo, market forces shape programming to appeal to the diverse, wealthy oligarch class.
The absence of major broadcasting networks results in a wide array of programming tailored to different local markets throughout the world. This fosters a rich tapestry of unique and diverse television shows catering to various consumer preferences and tastes.
Despite the dominance of independently-owned television stations, the rise of new social media platforms, media conglomerates, and increased government censorship threaten the continued existence of this decentralized system. Media consolidation, especially, has posed challenges to the diversity and local identity of programming as corporations seek to streamline their operations and reach broader audiences.
